Use cases

Where recorded compatibility evidence and finding-specific verification replace guesswork.

Audit

Record what each named protocol observed.

Diagnose

Trace each production finding to evidence.

Verify

Re-run the protocol required by the remediation.

The common boundary

These workflows need evidence about the page and protocol that actually ran. They do not need a universal score or a promise about downstream provider behavior.

Release owners

Platform and web engineering

Did this release change what a direct consumer can acquire or extract?

Record the response and representations before a change, then verify each identified remediation against the same protocol set after deployment.

Publishers and content teams

Content operations

Is meaningful page content available without client-side construction?

Use raw-versus-rendered and deterministic main-content evidence to find material delivery deficits without turning word counts into a quality score.

Schema and content engineers

Structured data and machine-readable content

Is supported structured data parseable and present in the initial response?

Separate syntax failure, browser-only markup, material visible-text mismatches, and genuine absence instead of collapsing them into one grade.

Legal, policy, and infrastructure teams

AI policy governance

Which documented actor is allowed or disallowed for this exact path?

Review purpose-specific robots decisions for discovery, training, grounding, and user-action actors under an explicit audit profile.

CFOs and finance teams

AI accountability and finance sign-off

Can we show exactly what the fetches received — and what we fixed?

Present recorded acquisition evidence and verified fixes as accountability artifacts: what was blocked, what changed, and the rescan that verified the remediation.

Client delivery teams

Agencies and technical consultants

See how agencies baseline, deliver, and verify audit proof for each engagement. Agency workflow →

Operators

Reliability and regression monitoring

Did a previously fixed blocker return?

Track the same URL and compare immutable evidence bundles. Failed or incompatible candidate runs remain indeterminate rather than becoming a false regression claim.

Agency workflow

Audit, remediate, and hand over client-ready proof

Run the same evidence protocol across client sites, hand over the recorded result set, and re-run the same checks after fixes ship.

  1. Baseline

    Audit each client site with the same protocol set and keep the sealed evidence bundle: what ran, what was found, and the stated limitations.

  2. Deliver

    Hand over the PDF report with the protocol record, findings, remediations, and the verification result for each implemented fix.

  3. Verify after the fix

    Re-run the finding-specific rescan after remediation ships; the result is recorded as VERIFIED, NOT VERIFIED, or INDETERMINATE.

White-label PDF reports

Growth, when paid access opens

Brand the PDF report chrome with your organization name, logo, and accent color. Requires Growth with an active paid subscription.

API + webhooks

Starter and up, when paid access opens

Pull audit results programmatically and receive events at your endpoint. Paid plans only, with an active Stripe subscription status.

25 monitored sites

Growth, when paid access opens

Weekly monitoring for 25 sites on Growth. Monitor scans do not consume the monthly pool, and Growth includes 40 scans/month shared with dashboard scans.

Rescan verification

All plans — Available now

Every tier records a finding-specific rescan result as VERIFIED, NOT VERIFIED, or INDETERMINATE. Re-run the same checks after a fix and keep the result next to the original evidence.

Today this is one workspace per account. Per-client workspaces, seats, and client share links are not part of the product yet. White-label branding applies to the report chrome only and never changes audit content.

API and webhook workflows

Evidence-first API results expose the audit verdict, execution state, profile, protocols, findings, remediations, limitations, and verification summary. Where a secondary comparison index is present, it is labeled display-only and is never an input to the verdict.

Review the API contract